<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fractal sharpening a new digital processing tool from Noel Carboni</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2009/06/30/fractal-sharpening-a-new-digital-processing-tool-from-noel-carboni/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2009/06/30/fractal-sharpening-a-new-digital-processing-tool-from-noel-carboni/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Imaging Deep-Sky Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 08:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2009/06/30/fractal-sharpening-a-new-digital-processing-tool-from-noel-carboni/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/?p=820#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Hi Graham,

Greg here - the one that does the imaging, Noel does the image processing.  I had problems with narrowband filters and the Hyperstar due to the reasons you give - but that&#039;s because the Hyperstar is f#2 which means a considerable cone angle to the rays passing through the filter.  I had no trouble using the same filters on a Sky 90 at f#4.5 so I am not expecting any problems on my Canon 40D at f#4 or above.  I&#039;ll let you know if I run into problems.

Best,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Graham,</p>
<p>Greg here &#8211; the one that does the imaging, Noel does the image processing.  I had problems with narrowband filters and the Hyperstar due to the reasons you give &#8211; but that&#8217;s because the Hyperstar is f#2 which means a considerable cone angle to the rays passing through the filter.  I had no trouble using the same filters on a Sky 90 at f#4.5 so I am not expecting any problems on my Canon 40D at f#4 or above.  I&#8217;ll let you know if I run into problems.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2009/06/30/fractal-sharpening-a-new-digital-processing-tool-from-noel-carboni/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/?p=820#comment-555</guid>
		<description>Hi Noel,

Just wondering about your choice of 77mm IDAS filter with a wide angle DSLR setup. I think you&#039;ll find it disappointing due to the gradient across the frame. This is due to the angle of incidence at the edges giving a greater thickness of the filter towards the outside. I found my 67mm IDAs filter was just usable with my P67 kit and 165mm lens and even then it had a gradient. I&#039;d be interested to hear how you get on with it.

Best Regards,
Graham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Noel,</p>
<p>Just wondering about your choice of 77mm IDAS filter with a wide angle DSLR setup. I think you&#8217;ll find it disappointing due to the gradient across the frame. This is due to the angle of incidence at the edges giving a greater thickness of the filter towards the outside. I found my 67mm IDAs filter was just usable with my P67 kit and 165mm lens and even then it had a gradient. I&#8217;d be interested to hear how you get on with it.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Graham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

