<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Forest Observatory&#187; Deep Space Objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/category/writing/articles/writing-dsos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com</link>
	<description>Adventures in Imaging Deep-Sky Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Registar says 68,200</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/09/18/registar-says-68200/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/09/18/registar-says-68200/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Space Objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/?p=2204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of people have asked me how many stars appear in the Cocoon nebula 3-frame mosaic.  I use a program called Registar to link separate frames together so I can see how they all fit &#8211; and Registar will also do a &#8220;star count&#8221; for the stars in the image (I don&#8217;t think it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/nebulae/cocoon_alldata.jpg" title="Additional right hand frame from the Hyperstar III" class="thickbox" rel="singlepic353" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/353__250x100_cocoon_alldata.jpg" alt="cocoon_alldata" title="cocoon_alldata" />
</a>

<p>A number of people have asked me how many stars appear in the Cocoon nebula 3-frame mosaic.  I use a program called Registar to link separate frames together so I can see how they all fit &#8211; and Registar will also do a &#8220;star count&#8221; for the stars in the image (I don&#8217;t think it is accurate to the level of a star <img src='http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )  Anyway &#8211; Registar says there are 68,200 in this image &#8211; always turns out to be a LOT less than you would guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/09/18/registar-says-68200/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NGC6883 and NGC6871 open clusters in Cygnus</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/08/18/ngc6883-and-ngc6871-open-clusters-in-cygnus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/08/18/ngc6883-and-ngc6871-open-clusters-in-cygnus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCD Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Space Objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperstar and SXVF-M25C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/?p=2146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This pair of open clusters has a Milky Way backdrop and they are surrounded by faint emission nebulosity.  They can be found in the constellation Cygnus lying just underneath the Crescent nebula region.  Image taken 19th August 2009 using the Hyperstar III &#8211; 22 sub-exposures at 5-minutes per sub (equivalent to 30-minute subs on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/starclusters/ngc6883_ngc6871_forums.jpg" title="With a Milky Way background and sitting in the middle of a load of faint emission nebulosity." class="thickbox" rel="singlepic486" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/486__200x150_ngc6883_ngc6871_forums.jpg" alt="NGC6883 and NGC6871 in Cygnus" title="NGC6883 and NGC6871 in Cygnus" />
</a>

<p>This pair of open clusters has a Milky Way backdrop and they are surrounded by faint emission nebulosity.  They can be found in the constellation Cygnus lying just underneath the Crescent nebula region.  Image taken 19th August 2009 using the Hyperstar III &#8211; 22 sub-exposures at 5-minutes per sub (equivalent to 30-minute subs on the Sky 90).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/08/18/ngc6883-and-ngc6871-open-clusters-in-cygnus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A galaxy group in Bootes</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/08/16/a-galaxy-group-in-bootes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/08/16/a-galaxy-group-in-bootes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Space Objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky 90 and SXVF-M25C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/?p=2137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I have no idea why I took this image of a galaxy group in Bootes on January 29th 2011.  I also have no record of it in the logbook.  I ran an astrometry check on it to find where it was &#8211; the bright star near the middle is magnitude 4.80.  Apparently this is 19 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/galaxies/galaxies_forum.jpg" title="Including NGC5529, NGC5533, NGC5614" class="thickbox" rel="singlepic482" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/482__150x200_galaxies_forum.jpg" alt="Galaxy group in Bootes" title="Galaxy group in Bootes" />
</a>
 
<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/galaxies/galaxies_bw_forum.jpg" title="NGC5529, NGC5533, NGC5614" class="thickbox" rel="singlepic483" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/483__150x200_galaxies_bw_forum.jpg" alt="Galaxy group in Bootes in B&W" title="Galaxy group in Bootes in B&W" />
</a>

<p>I have no idea why I took this image of a galaxy group in Bootes on January 29th 2011.  I also have no record of it in the logbook.  I ran an astrometry check on it to find where it was &#8211; the bright star near the middle is magnitude 4.80.  Apparently this is 19 sub-exposures at 10-minutes per sub, so for some reason I spent 3 hours of good imaging time on this one &#8211; if only I could remember why <img src='http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2011/08/16/a-galaxy-group-in-bootes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Brightest Known Object in Our Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2007/07/19/quasar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2007/07/19/quasar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Space Objects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/index.php/2007/08/02/quasar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Guiness Book of Records this Quasar in the constellation Lynx is the brightest known object in our universe and who are we to argue with them [oops - see the Postscript below]!
Back to the Beginning of Time Itself
 This deep-sky colour photograph at first sight shows what appears to be a fairly unimpressive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Guiness Book of Records this Quasar in the constellation Lynx is the brightest known object in our universe and who are we to argue with them [oops - see the Postscript below]!<span id="more-34"></span></p>
<h3>Back to the Beginning of Time Itself</h3>
<p>
<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/quasarsandother/Quasar_Book.jpg" title="A uncropped wider field of view of the quasar region in Lynx." class="thickbox" rel="singlepic78" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/78__200x150_Quasar_Book.jpg" alt="Distant Quasar wide field" title="Distant Quasar wide field" />
</a>
 This deep-sky colour photograph at first sight shows what appears to be a fairly unimpressive star-field, with an arrow pointing towards a fairly dim, very red, and similarly unimpressive star.  First impressions can however be very misleading, as they are in this case.</p>
<p>Even though this red star&#8217;s appearance is pretty uninspiring it comes with a very grandiose label, this star is in fact a quasar designated APM08279+5255, a quasar being the contraction of &#8220;quasi-stellar object&#8221;.  Nobody really knows what quasars are but one hypothesis is that they are black holes emitting tremendous amounts of energy from beyond the event horizon, as they capture huge quantities of matter from nearby stars.</p>
<p>The quasar in this image is clearly red so lets take a closer look.</p>
<h3>A Closer Look and an Explanation</h3>
<p>
<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/quasarsandother/Quasar_Article.jpg" title="The very red dim &quot;star&quot; at the point of the arrow is a quasar - APM08279+5255 - which lies 12.9 billion light years away in the constellation Lynx.  It is so red due to its enormous red shift.  A single Hyperstar frame composed of 46 sub-exposures with an exposure time of 50-seconds per sub." class="thickbox" rel="singlepic77" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/77__200x150_Quasar_Article.jpg" alt="Distant Quasar crop" title="Distant Quasar crop" />
</a>
 In fact it is a very deep red and was a candidate for a so-called carbon star that was thought to lie within our own galaxy.  The reason this quasar is so red is due to its enormous red shift of 3.87, which means it lies a very long way away.  To be more precise APM08279+5255 lies 12.9 billion light years away from us in the constellation Lynx in the Northern Hemisphere.  Consider that our Universe erupted out of the big bang only something like 13.7 billion years ago and you can start to appreciate what a totally amazing object this quasar is.  It was created near the beginning of time itself.</p>
<p>Although APM08279+5255 only appears to be a magnitude 15.2 star, far too dim to be seen with the naked eye, it was still bright enough for people to think it was in our own galaxy.  The reason it appears &#8220;so bright&#8221; to us is due to yet another strange coincidence regarding this object.  Between the quasar and Earth lies a large galaxy with the huge gravitational field usually associated with such a collection of stars, and it is the &#8220;gravitational lensing&#8221; provided by this galaxy that &#8220;magnifies&#8221; the weak light from the distant quasar making it more easily detected by our Earthbound telescopes.</p>
<h3>Postscript</h3>
<p>This quasar no longer holds the record for being the brightest object in the Universe.  Apparently it didn&#8217;t actually hold this record at the time of its discovery either.  Recall that the quasar appears to be so bright due to the gravitational lensing effect of a galaxy lying between the quasar and ourselves &#8211; well, it seems the existence of this galaxy wasn&#8217;t actually known at the time of the discovery and therefore its lensing effect wasn&#8217;t taken into account when initially considering the quasar&#8217;s brightness.</p>
<h3>Acquiring the Image </h3>
<p>This unique colour image was taken on a Celestron Nexstar 11 GPS reflecting telescope with a Hyperstar lens attachment.  The image was acquired using a Starlight Xpress SXV-H9C one-shot colour CCD camera.  The image itself is made up from 46 sub-exposures of 50 seconds each, giving a total imaging time of only 38 minutes.  Such short imaging times are made possible using the Hyperstar lens, which turns the normally &#8220;slow&#8221; f/10, telescope into an extremely &#8220;fast&#8221; f/1.85 telephoto lens.  Once the raw image data had been acquired it was expertly processed by Noel Carboni, Florida, U.S.A. using his commercially available suite of PhotoShop actions.</p>
<h3>Where to Find It</h3>
<p>The quasar APM08279+5255 can be found at R.A. 08hours 31 minutes 41.60 seconds and DEC. +52 degrees 45 minutes 16.80 seconds.  A telescope with &#8220;goto&#8221; capabilities can be easily programmed to slew to this object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2007/07/19/quasar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

