<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Forest Observatory&#187; Veil Nebula</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/tag/veil-nebula/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com</link>
	<description>Adventures in Imaging Deep-Sky Objects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>

		<item>
		<title>The Veil nebula &#8211; reloaded</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2008/03/20/the-veil-nebula-reloaded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2008/03/20/the-veil-nebula-reloaded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sky 90 and SXVF-M25C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veil Nebula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky 90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXVF-M25C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/index.php/2008/03/20/the-veil-nebula-reloaded/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noel reprocessed the Veil nebula data making the stars less obtrusive and sharpening up the nebulosity a little to emphasize the filaments.  It&#8217;s a personal choice as to which version you prefer &#8211; I like the down-played stars myself.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel reprocessed the Veil nebula data making the stars less obtrusive and sharpening up the nebulosity a little to emphasize the filaments.  It&#8217;s a personal choice as to which version you prefer &#8211; I like the down-played stars myself.</p>

<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/nebulae/veil_nebula_latest.jpg" title="A slight reprocess of the Veil nebula." class="thickbox" rel="singlepic178" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/178__150x200_veil_nebula_latest.jpg" alt="veil_nebula_latest.jpg" title="veil_nebula_latest.jpg" />
</a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2008/03/20/the-veil-nebula-reloaded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Veil Nebula in Cygnus Imaging Project: Almost, but not quite&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2007/09/08/the-veil-nebula-in-cygnus-imaging-project-almost-but-not-quite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2007/09/08/the-veil-nebula-in-cygnus-imaging-project-almost-but-not-quite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 14:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sky 90 and SXVF-M25C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veil Nebula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky 90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXVF-M25C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newforestobservatory.com/index.php/2007/09/08/the-veil-nebula-in-cygnus-imaging-project-almost-but-not-quite/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last RGB image of the Veil nebula has been significantly improved by adding some H-alpha and some OIII narrowband data as can be seen in the accompanying image. 
However, the project has turned into an even bigger undertaking. 
I decided that I needed to get the nebulosity south of this region, so I embarked on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last RGB image of the Veil nebula has been significantly improved by adding some H-alpha and some OIII narrowband data as can be seen in the accompanying image. </p>
<p>However, the project has turned into an even bigger undertaking. </p>
<p>I decided that I needed to get the nebulosity south of this region, so I embarked on a full two-frame Sky 90/M25C mosaic to capture the whole of the Veil complex.  I now only need the RGB data of the southern region (H-alpha and OIII already taken) in order to have an extremely deep and detailed image of the whole of the Veil.</p>
<p>The statistics make frightening reading.  So far I have taken 142 sub-exposures amounting to 27 hours total imaging time and a 1.7 GB file size.  The addition of the final RGB data is likely to take this project to over 30 hours total imaging time with a file size in excess of 2 GB. </p>
<p>I am not sure I will undertake such a mammoth task again without the aid of the mini-WASP array!</p>
<p>The original image is on the left and the improved images (with H-alpha and OIII narrowband data) is on the right:</p>

<a href="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/projects/Veil_Complex_Greg_Noel_with_Ha3_small.jpg" title="This image comprises over 17 hours of total exposure time including 3 and a half hours of narrow band H-alpha data.  Over 8 hours of Hyperstar data for the Witch's Broom region was also included in this image.  Processing time more than equals imaging time and Noel has excelled himself" class="thickbox" rel="singlepic113" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.newforestobservatory.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/cache/113__200x150_Veil_Complex_Greg_Noel_with_Ha3_small.jpg" alt="Veil Nebula 90percent complete" title="Veil Nebula 90percent complete" />
</a>
[singlepic id="127" w="200" h="150" mode="" float="" ]
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newforestobservatory.com/2007/09/08/the-veil-nebula-in-cygnus-imaging-project-almost-but-not-quite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
